Warning: Constant WP_DEBUG_DISPLAY already defined in /customers/e/8/f/foreningenja.org/httpd.www/wp-content/themes/YES_theme/functions.php on line 2 {"id":83,"date":"2011-03-01T16:06:01","date_gmt":"2011-03-01T15:06:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.foreningenja.org\/utv\/?p=83"},"modified":"2011-11-27T13:35:30","modified_gmt":"2011-11-27T12:35:30","slug":"johanna-gustavsson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.foreningenja.org\/en\/artists\/johanna-gustavsson\/","title":{"rendered":"Johanna Gustavsson"},"content":{"rendered":"

Right now:
\nMalm\u00f6 Free University for Women takes over art institution Konsthall C<\/a> with the project Insisting to be part of this moment\/movement (\u00f6vertygade om v\u00e5r storhet) April 1 \u2013 May 29 2011. We also just released the book Do The Right Thing \u2013 a manual<\/em> from MFK.<\/p>\n

Together with my American colleague Tia-Simone Gardner I am initiating Walking back, talking back – an investigation in 4 parts on the development of the Black Power Movement in the US and the UK; One is a basic mapping of the origin and organization of the movements in the US and the UK. Secondly, were where the women? We know that the term intersectionality grew out of the practical situation for black feminists of the 60ties and 70ties; the black power movement didn\u2019t want to acknowledge that them being women meant dealing with another type of oppression then being black, and the white hegemonic feminist movement didn\u2019t want to acknowledge that it meant something that they were black and women, the situation led to the forming of the black feminist movement. Where are we at today and what can we learn from this? Thirdly we want to look and compare the different developments between the US and the UK to the present day where (to simplify things) the UK movement moved in to academia and developed Cultural Studies whereas in the US the focus was on community building. bell hooks says: \u201cWhen our lived experience of theorizing is fundamentally linked to processes of self-recovery, of collective liberation, no gap exists between theory and practice.\u201d As we understand it was the founding goal of both groups to bridge this gap, so why this split? What influences do post-colonial histories, labor- and educational political programs and immigrant policies have on their different developments? Because each site has unique histories of oppression, it is interesting to look closer at the following resistance and possibilities for social struggles; the UK and its colonized people, the US and its enslaved. The fourth aspect is therefore to look at the pedagogical aspects of the movements. We know for example that it was obligatory for those who joined the Black Panther guerrilla section to also read Franz Fanon and Karl Marx, but Fanon and Marx are not the easiest thinkers and writers so how did they organize that? How did they connect the writings with the doing? How were they able to make Fanon and Marx understandable and relatable, especially under the U.S. Empiricism and anti Communist politics?<\/p>\n

During fall 2011 I am developing a series of performance lectures together with artist Jeuno Kim.<\/p>\n

2011 I am part of a collaborative writing project called Schackrummet (The Chess Room) initiated by Sinziana Ravini.<\/p>\n

JOHANNA GUSTAVSSON CV.pdf<\/a>(in Swedish)<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"